Member-only story
Can we abolish the Senate already?
That old hackneyed joke — If pro is the opposite of con, then isn’t Congress the opposite of progress? — has never rung truer than it does today. It’s particularly the case in the upper house, where forward movement on voting rights, climate change and other critical issues is being held up by Republican obstructionists in the Senate (and their conservative Democratic accomplices). Folks have been floating the idea of ending the filibuster to bypass the logjam. That would be a good start, but the real problem is the Senate itself.
Like the electoral college and first-past-the-post voting, the Senate is an undemocratic relic that needs to go. It’s an artifact of a different time and a political reality totally unlike our own.
When the country was founded, it had only 2.5 million people. The central government was weak by design. Each of the former colonies was like a mini nation with its own particular interests, and the overriding concern was to strike a balance among them. They couldn’t even conceive of the kind of complex issues that require a national response like we face today, e.g. infrastructure, telecom regulation and so on.
At the time, the disparity in population sizes wasn’t so great, either.
Virginia, the largest state, had 700,000 more people than the smallest. Today, California, with 39.4…
