Member-only story

Why there will be no justice for Jacob Blake

His shooting may have been unjust, but in the eyes of the law, it probably wasn’t ‘unreasonable’

Justin Ward
7 min readAug 31, 2020
(Becker1999/CC-BY)

There’s a reason why the chant “no justice, no peace” is a staple of protests against police violence. The slogan is evergreen. It states simply and plainly what the deal is: Give us justice, then there will be peace. And it’s a compact that is constantly broken. The latest wave of unrest that has broken out since Kenosha police shot Jacob Blake is rooted in a lack of justice — or an expectation of it.

As infuriating as they may be, the actions of officer Rusten Sheskey, the officer who shot Blake seven times in the back, will most likely be deemed lawful.

Jacob Blake’s sister Letetra Widman speaks at a rally in Washington, D.C. on Aug. 28 (Parker Miller/CC-BY)

When it comes to policing, there is broad space for injustice within the boundaries of the law.

Something an officer does can be unjust but not unconstitutional, and this contradiction has driven the cycle of police violence and revolt over the past few decades.

Blake’s case calls to mind the 2010 fatal shooting of Aaron Campbell, another unarmed black man, in Portland. His girlfriend had…

--

--

Justin Ward
Justin Ward

Written by Justin Ward

Journalist and activist. Founder and co-chair of DivestSPD. Bylines at SPLC, The Baffler, GEN, USA Today. Follow on Twitter: @justwardoctrine, @DivestSPD

Responses (2)